Animal-model concordance

Study

Clonogenic assay with established human tumour xenografts

2004 · primary-comparison · peer reviewed: yes · record 15120036 · PubMed

1 finding kept from this study. Each is one sentence comparing an animal with a human, extracted from the full text, checked against the located page, and adjudicated against the review's definition of an animal-versus-human comparison.

90% of 80 comparisons between clinical response of tumors and their explants established in nude mice and treated in vivo showed correct prediction for tumor sensitivity.

Concordant · level A · mouse · oncology · 90–97 percent · n /80

“Of 80 comparisons performed, we observed a correct prediction for tumour resistance in 97% and for tumour sensitivity in 90%.”
page 1

Full texts are copyrighted and are not republished here. The quote is the evidence for the extracted value, and the page number lets you check it in the original.